Call for Papers
Quick Links
Peer Review Policy
Peer review is a fundamental component in ensuring the quality, credibility, and integrity of scholarly publications. The TEJAS Journal of Technologies and Humanitarian Sciences (TJTHS) follows internationally recognized ethical standards and adopts a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, transparency, and unbiased evaluation. The identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the process. The journal follows a structured two-stage review system.
📌 Stage 1: Initial Editorial Screening
• Manuscripts are evaluated by the editorial team and Editor-in-Chief.
• Assessment includes scope relevance, originality, technical quality, and formatting compliance.
• Plagiarism screening is conducted using standard tools (Turnitin/iThenticate).
• Papers with ethical issues or poor quality may be rejected at this stage.
• Authors may be asked to revise before peer review if required.
📌 Stage 2: Double-Blind External Peer Review
• Manuscripts are reviewed by minimum three independent external reviewers.
• Double-blind system ensures anonymity of both authors and reviewers.
• Reviewers are selected based on expertise and research background.
• Evaluation criteria include originality, methodology, clarity, and contribution.
• Typical review timeline: 2–4 weeks.
Editorial Decisions:
✔ Accept
✔ Minor Revision
✔ Major Revision
✔ Reject
• Revised manuscripts may undergo re-evaluation.
• Final decision is taken by the Editor-in-Chief.
âš– Ethical Standards & Responsibilities
• All participants must follow strict publication ethics and confidentiality.
• Reviewers must provide unbiased, constructive, and timely feedback.
• Conflicts of interest must be disclosed immediately.
• Authors must ensure originality and proper citation of sources.
• Any plagiarism or unethical practice will lead to rejection.
• Published articles may be retracted if ethical violations are found later.
Licensed under