TEJAS Journal of Technologies and Humanitarian Science

Peer Review Policy

Peer review is essential for maintaining the quality and integrity of published articles. The TEJAS Journal of Technologies and Humanitarian Sciences (TJTHS) is committed to upholding the highest standards of peer review. The journal employs a two-stage review process:

Stage 1:

• Each submitted manuscript undergoes an initial screening by the editorial team.
• The screening assesses the alignment with the journal's aims and scope, presence of serious language issues and compliance with manuscript formatting guidelines.
• Based on this evaluation the manuscripts may be rejected outright through an editorial decision or aernatively, they may be returned to authors for necessary revisions before further review.

Stage 2:

• Manuscripts that pass preliminary screening are sent to two or more external reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
• Editors may assign additional reviewers if deemed necessary.
• The journal follows a single-blind review process, the meaning of single-blind review process know the identity of the authors. Authors do not know the reviewers.
• Based on reviewers reports, the editors may: Accept the manuscript or Reject the manuscript or Request revisions from the authors.
• Reviewers are expected to provide objective and timely evaluations, upport their opinions with clear arguments and maintain confidentiality of the reviewed content.
• If a reviewer feels unqualified or has a conflict of interest, they must inform the editor immediately.